The Sangh
The Sangh viewpoints, generally co-ordinated by RSS (Rashtriya Swayam-Sevak Sangh), are not only a natural continuation of the British doctrines but also are self-destructive based on hate and mistrust. The Sangh conveniently oppose everything that British rulers were against and used to keep a dead silence on the ill-intended divisive policies and explicit and implicit cruelties of them that damaged the social fabric and collective wisdom of India. They are always active in blaming pre-British India (and post-British governments) for everything and try to give a narrative that, protectionism and reversal of 500 years back, with some speculations on fancy wisdom, will guide us to prosperity. In reality, they use these tactics to grab power, like the British, just to gain control of the capital, which is quite evident from the policies and priorities of BJP governments.
On the other hand, Pandit Jawahar Lal Nehru was well aware of this trap, and while allowing them to function, he aimed their transformation. But, on a serious review, as a nation in general and the Congress in particular somewhat failed to keep the ideological views to keep them in the right place.
The Backdoor
The systematic political polarization of the institutions, in fact, started much before the BJP officially started ruling the country. From the late 1960s, sympathisers of the Sangh views managed to deploy trojan horses and narratives of security concerns to support the ploys. These elements were instrumental in decision-making now and then, even in the UPA regime. I wish to highlight just two examples of their influence:
- The rules and regulations of TADA, UAPA, ED and NIA were practically formed to bypass judicial jurisdiction, and the ability of subjects to go for appeal is minimal. The period of detainment for trial is without a cap. This clearly shows the non-democratic attitude of the people involved; and clearly not a Congress way of doing things
- The foreigner’s act and passport act related rules and regulations were amended much before CAA 2019 with almost similar provisions of CAA 2019. This indicates that the work was under preparation.
Also, there was no friction from higher officials in accepting the BJP regime, and the stage was already set to accept them. On the other hand, brilliant officials like T N Sheshan and Raghuram Rajan were used to tarnish the image of the Congress block in a structured way.
We can see these as the results of a well-planned and coordinated backdoor effort, which everyone should seriously handle. Even if the INDIA block gets a political mandate, sizable such activities will serve the government with a well-defined hidden agenda. Congress should be sensitive to tackle this, as these, in effect, nullify our democratic participatory political vision of our country.
Focus Points
In the above context, the below focus items seem very relevant to me, to keep ourselves focused on nation-building and to neutralize ill-informed narratives:
No comments:
Post a Comment